Which term describes the opposing-counsel questioning of a witness?

Which term describes the opposing-counsel questioning of a witness?

• A. Direct examination
• B. Pattern jury instructions
• C. Writ of execution
• D. Cross-examination

Answer: (D)

Cross-examination is the questioning of a witness by the opposing counsel after the witness has been questioned by the side that called them. The purpose is to test the witness’s testimony—check memory, perception, and credibility, and look for inconsistencies or biases by introducing other evidence or earlier statements. It often uses leading questions to control the response and reveal weaknesses in the testimony. By contrast, direct examination is conducted by the party who called the witness to elicit favorable facts; pattern jury instructions are standard directions given to juries by the judge; a writ of execution is a court order to collect a judgment.

Cross-examination is the questioning of a witness by the opposing counsel after the witness has been questioned by the side that called them. The purpose is to test the witness’s testimony—check memory, perception, and credibility, and look for inconsistencies or biases by introducing other evidence or earlier statements. It often uses leading questions to control the response and reveal weaknesses in the testimony. By contrast, direct examination is conducted by the party who called the witness to elicit favorable facts; pattern jury instructions are standard directions given to juries by the judge; a writ of execution is a court order to collect a judgment.